Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1
Date: 2009-09-25 17:25:35
Message-ID: 1253899535.4449.699.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 15:50 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> Hang on, isn't this 180 degrees backwards?

A witty riposte escapes me; yes, the if test is !correct.

What I find amazing is that it passed the test where I put it doing make
installcheck in an infinite loop for a long time. I guess that means the
regression tests hardly touch the concurrency code at all, which now I
think about it makes sense but I still find that very worrying. :-(

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Mason 2009-09-25 17:38:58 Re: [HACKERS] libpq port number handling
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-09-25 16:27:58 Re: recovery is stuck when children are not processing SIGQUIT from previous crash