Re: [HACKERS] libpq port number handling

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq port number handling
Date: 2009-09-25 06:29:24
Message-ID: 1253860164.26523.3.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 20:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, are port numbers still limited to 16 bits in IPv6?

Port numbers are in TCP, not in IP.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2009-09-25 07:05:02 Re: Exception 0xC0000005
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-09-25 06:21:35 Re: [HACKERS] libpq port number handling

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-09-25 08:49:37 Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-09-25 06:25:23 Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5