Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1
Date: 2005-09-21 19:06:24
Message-ID: 20050921190620.GB31453@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 06:10:15PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Table Partitioning is in 8.1
>
> I've just read Peter Eisentraut's presentation to the Dutch gov (very
> good BTW). On the last page I read that Table Partitioning is a future
> for PostgreSQL....which is strange because Constraint Exclusion is an
> 8.1 feature.

I think it depends on how closely you relate "Table Partitioning" and
"Constraint Exclusion". While you can use the latter to implement the
former, I think people expect a database that supports "Table
Partitioning" to have a CREATE PARTITION command (or something
similar).

> Is it possible that the Release Notes do not fully explain the
> Constraint Exclusion feature? Or is it the consensus that it works but
> not quite well enough to make a song and dance about yet?

IMHO, I think Constraint Exclusion is more useful in general and once
it is in and tested future releases will have a partitioning system
based upon it.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-09-21 19:10:04 Re: statement_timeout logging
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2005-09-21 18:22:26 Re: postgresql clustering