Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1
Date: 2005-01-19 20:58:55
Message-ID: 20050119165747.U47533@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


If the patch is ready to be committed early in the cycle, I'd say most
definitely ... just depends on how late in the cycle its ready ...

I *believe* that 8.1, we're looking at a 2mo cycle before beta, so figure
beta for ~April 1st (no april fools jokes, eh?) ...

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Now that we got 8.0 out of the door, I'm submitting my two-phase commit patch
> again for discussion.
>
> http://www.hut.fi/~hlinnaka/pgsql/
>
> Do we want it in 8.1, if we want a short development cycle? It needs a new
> pg_twophase subdirectory, and it introduces a new system view, so I guess it
> requires an initdb (or pg_upgrade).
>
> Any comments on the implementation or the new commands?
>
> I would appreciate help testing the JDBC driver with an application server
> that does XA recovery properly.
>
> - Heikki
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2005-01-19 21:32:47 Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-01-19 20:40:53 Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)