From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1 |
Date: | 2005-01-20 00:42:03 |
Message-ID: | 1115.1106181723@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> If the patch is ready to be committed early in the cycle, I'd say most
> definitely ... just depends on how late in the cycle its ready ...
My recollection is that it's quite far from being complete. I had hoped
to spend some time during the 8.1 cycle helping Heikki finish it up,
but if we stick to the 2-month-dev-cycle idea I'm afraid there's no way
it'll be done in time. I thought that "some time" would probably amount
to a solid man-month or so, and there's no way I can spend half my time
on just one feature for this cycle.
If Heikki wants this in for 8.1, the right thing to do is vote against
the short-dev-cycle idea. But we need a plausible answer about what to
do about ARC to make that credible...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-01-20 00:54:27 | Re: ARC patent |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-01-20 00:34:17 | Re: ARC patent |