Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1
Date: 2005-01-20 00:42:03
Message-ID: 1115.1106181723@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> If the patch is ready to be committed early in the cycle, I'd say most
> definitely ... just depends on how late in the cycle its ready ...

My recollection is that it's quite far from being complete. I had hoped
to spend some time during the 8.1 cycle helping Heikki finish it up,
but if we stick to the 2-month-dev-cycle idea I'm afraid there's no way
it'll be done in time. I thought that "some time" would probably amount
to a solid man-month or so, and there's no way I can spend half my time
on just one feature for this cycle.

If Heikki wants this in for 8.1, the right thing to do is vote against
the short-dev-cycle idea. But we need a plausible answer about what to
do about ARC to make that credible...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2005-01-20 00:54:27 Re: ARC patent
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2005-01-20 00:34:17 Re: ARC patent