Re: Copyright

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Copyright
Date: 2002-06-21 03:00:43
Message-ID: 200206210300.g5L30h127107@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > I see in ri_triggers.c:
> >
> > * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2002, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
> > * Copyright 1999 Jan Wieck
> >
> > Jan, are you holding copyright on this or is it dual, and what does dual
> > mean in this case?
>
> Sure do I, do I? Hmmm, I can't even tell what percentage of the
> sourcecode is mine. I guess the second line predates the
> "Portions Copyright" and the one who plastered that simply failed
> to removed my name. If memory serves I agreed to removal of all
> my personal Copyright lines when we discussed the new License
> text. Didn't I?

Removed.

> So reading Copyright lines is what you do at teatime? Man, don't
> you have to tickle Catherine, apply some patches or do something
> else that has value?

:-)

Going through my email, Vince mentioned it. It isn't glamorous, but it
needs to be done.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-21 03:25:23 Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-21 02:50:04 Re: [GENERAL] Idea for the statistics collector