Re: stupid patch of pg_dumplo

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, andrea gelmini <bungle(at)linux(dot)it>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: stupid patch of pg_dumplo
Date: 2001-11-12 17:44:32
Message-ID: 200111121744.fACHiWY07597@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tough call. It is /contrib, which can get changes pretty late. Let's
> > see if someone else has an opinion.
>
> Well, if I look at it with a gimlet eye then it looks like a new feature
> ;-) ... but considering that it's in contrib, I say let it pass. The
> risk seems very low.

OK, that's two yes votes. Patch applied to /contrib/pg_dumplo.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-11-12 18:01:48 Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME fix
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-11-12 17:44:14 Re: stupid patch of pg_dumplo