Re: stupid patch of pg_dumplo

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, andrea gelmini <bungle(at)linux(dot)it>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: stupid patch of pg_dumplo
Date: 2001-11-12 17:38:59
Message-ID: 15827.1005586739@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tough call. It is /contrib, which can get changes pretty late. Let's
> see if someone else has an opinion.

Well, if I look at it with a gimlet eye then it looks like a new feature
;-) ... but considering that it's in contrib, I say let it pass. The
risk seems very low.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-11-12 17:42:58 Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME fix
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-11-12 17:28:28 Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME fix