Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME fix

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME fix
Date: 2001-11-12 18:01:48
Message-ID: 200111121801.fACI1nG08966@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Instead of trying to fix this, how about making the RI triggers not use
> > the column names in the first place. (Instead they should use the oid of
> > the table and the attnums.)
>
> That would probably be a better answer in the long run, but since it
> implies initdb for everyone with an RI trigger, I'm disinclined to
> attack it that way during beta.

If that is the proper answer, maybe we should just leave it and fix it
properly in 7.3.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Down 2001-11-12 18:53:45 absolute() error with jdbc7.1-1.2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-11-12 17:44:32 Re: stupid patch of pg_dumplo