Re: Re: New relkind for views]

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Mark Hollomon <mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: New relkind for views]
Date: 2000-10-16 23:52:54
Message-ID: 200010162352.TAA21741@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > "Hollomon, Mark" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Do we still want to be able to inherit from views?
> > >
> > > Also:
> > >
> > > Currently a view may be dropped with either 'DROP VIEW'
> > > or 'DROP TABLE'. Should this be changed?
> >
> > I say let them drop it with either one.
>
> I kinda like the 'drop index with drop index', 'drop table with drop
> table' and 'drop view with drop view' groupings ... at least you are
> pretty sure you haven't 'oopsed' in the process :)

Good point. Oops is bad.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-10-17 00:14:51 RE: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-10-16 23:41:43 Re: Re: New relkind for views

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Hollomon 2000-10-17 00:53:01 Re: Re: New relkind for views
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-10-16 23:41:43 Re: Re: New relkind for views