| From: | Mark Hollomon <mhh(at)mindspring(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Hollomon <mhh(at)nortelnetworks(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: New relkind for views |
| Date: | 2000-10-17 00:53:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20001016205301.A975@jupiter |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 08:41:43PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > "Hollomon, Mark" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Do we still want to be able to inherit from views?
> > >
> > > Also:
> > >
> > > Currently a view may be dropped with either 'DROP VIEW'
> > > or 'DROP TABLE'. Should this be changed?
> >
> > I say let them drop it with either one.
>
> I kinda like the 'drop index with drop index', 'drop table with drop
> table' and 'drop view with drop view' groupings ... at least you are
> pretty sure you haven't 'oopsed' in the process :)
>
>
So the vote is now tied. Any other opinions
--
Mark Hollomon
mhh(at)mindspring(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-10-17 00:54:00 | Re: The lightbulb just went on... |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-17 00:51:10 | Re: fkey + primary key does not work in current |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-17 00:56:17 | Re: Re: New relkind for views |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-16 23:52:54 | Re: Re: New relkind for views] |