RE: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy
Date: 2000-10-17 00:14:51
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018D54@SECTORBASE1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > It looks like it wouldn't take too much work to replace
> > shared buffers on the basis of LRU-2 instead of LRU, so
> > I'm thinking about trying it.
> >
> > Has anyone looked into this area? Is there a better method to try?
>
> Sounds like a perfect idea. Good luck. :-)

Hmm, how much time will be required?
I integrate WAL right now and have to do significant changes
in bufmgr...

Vadim

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-10-17 00:28:36 RE: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-16 23:52:54 Re: Re: New relkind for views]