| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER |
| Date: | 2000-05-25 20:49:21 |
| Message-ID: | 200005252049.QAA08318@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 12:12:12PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > If you don't get rid of those then your parser will behave in surprising
> > > ways. So far you have noticed the fallout from only one of those
> > > conflicts, but every one of them is a potential bug. Be advised that
> > > gram.y patches that create unresolved conflicts will *not* be accepted.
> >
> > Yes, even I don't apply those, though they say I never met a patch I
> > didn't like. :-)
>
> Bruce, your going to _make_ me grovel through the archives, and prove
> that you were the first one to say that aren't you?
I believe it was a Thomas Lockhart line.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-25 22:28:42 | Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database |
| Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2000-05-25 20:39:23 | Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER |