| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached... |
| Date: | 2000-02-05 05:00:32 |
| Message-ID: | 200002050500.AAA16566@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> >*) The overhead for non-inheritance has
> >been cut down to 30 microseconds (on a pc).
We actually have to see how you have implemented it. I am not so
interested in timings as in your method. It can be done fast, or it can
be done sloppy. I will check the patch.
> And if SQL92 compliance is the goal, why must ANY degradation
> of performance be acceptable unless there are very, very strong
> reasons to do so (reasons that impact the target audience).
Agreed.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-05 05:05:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached... |
| Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2000-02-05 04:38:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached... |