| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> |
| Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Estimate of when CVS will be available again? |
| Date: | 2003-06-09 15:54:56 |
| Message-ID: | 17696.1055174096@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
>> Okay, I have CVSup up and available again, which allows you to
>> download the whole repository locally to work on ... is there a
>> strong reason why anoncvs is *required* to the repository with this
>> available?
> CVSup is a PITA to get setup on OSes other than FreeBSD?
Building CVSup from source is, um, a challenge (who the heck decided
Modula3 would be a good choice for writing allegedly-portable software?)
And, not everyone wants to store the entire project history locally.
I don't think it's reasonable to expect everyone to use cvsup.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-06-09 16:06:38 | Re: Linux 2.6 kernel, tuned for use with databases - does |
| Previous Message | Mark Cubitt | 2003-06-09 15:49:33 | 2 servers with 1 database cluster |