Re: Estimate of when CVS will be available again?

From: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Estimate of when CVS will be available again?
Date: 2003-06-09 18:28:04
Message-ID: 20030609182804.GG65470@perrin.int.nxad.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> >> Okay, I have CVSup up and available again, which allows you to
> >> download the whole repository locally to work on ... is there a
> >> strong reason why anoncvs is *required* to the repository with
> >> this available?
>
> > CVSup is a PITA to get setup on OSes other than FreeBSD?
>
> Building CVSup from source is, um, a challenge (who the heck decided
> Modula3 would be a good choice for writing allegedly-portable
> software?)

You can thank Polestra for that... though you can now build CVSup with
pm3 instead of modula-3.. much smaller since pm3 doesn't have any
windowing bits. There are rumors trickling around that once KSE is
done for FreeBSD (~5.2ish) that one of the guys will rewrite CVSup in
C...

> And, not everyone wants to store the entire project history locally.

You don't have to store the entire projects history... use a tag with
an explicit branch:

*default tag=RELENG_4
*default tag=RELEASE_7_3_3

or something like that and you get the equiv of an incremental cvs
export.

> I don't think it's reasonable to expect everyone to use cvsup.

Though I holistically agree with this. CVSup is more bandwidth
friendly for sure, but cvs(1) is _everywhere_.

-sc

--
Sean Chittenden

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fernando Papa 2003-06-09 19:48:10 Strange result with select/not null/OR
Previous Message Arguile 2003-06-09 17:59:54 Re: update phenomenom