| From: | Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT |
| Date: | 2005-09-02 14:34:50 |
| Message-ID: | 1125671690.8558.14.camel@dbamm01-linux |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> > Rewriting all my Oracle code function-by-function could be painful
> > ...
> > I'm still trying to hold on to my fantasy that I can hack Postgres (and
> > contrib/ora2pg) into submission.
>
> Why don't you just use EnterpriseDB?
I looked at EnterpriseDB a few months ago. The installation errored.
It left stuff in /var/opt, which I consider non-standard for a Red Hat
machine. The whole product just didn't feel clean to me. I admit
that's a pretty limited and subjective evaluation, especially for a beta
product, but I was in the mode of broadly evaluating alternatives, so I
moved on. Maybe I need to look at it again.
Basically I feel more secure tracking the core project, even if I need
to maintain some of my own patches.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Terry Lee Tucker | 2005-09-02 14:42:25 | Re: Question regarding FOUND |
| Previous Message | marcelo Cortez | 2005-09-02 14:30:42 | Re: lock problem |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-09-02 14:36:24 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-02 14:31:45 | Re: Question about explain of index scan |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-09-02 14:54:45 | Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT |
| Previous Message | Atsushi Ogawa | 2005-09-02 12:09:55 | Re: sum(int4)/sum(int2) improvement |