From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT |
Date: | 2005-09-02 01:16:59 |
Message-ID: | 4317A80B.9080807@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Why don't you just use EnterpriseDB?
Chris
> That would defeat my goal of not rewriting all my Oracle code.
>
> If I were fool enough to plan an attack on the main executor's exception
> handling to try and disarm it of its subtransaction semantics, where
> would I start? Where would I end? What would I do in between? Can New
> Orleans be rebuilt above sea level?
>
> Seriously, though, I'm willing to devote considerable time to this.
> Rewriting all my Oracle code function-by-function could be painful, and
> I would end up dragging other people around this company into it. I'm
> still trying to hold on to my fantasy that I can hack Postgres (and
> contrib/ora2pg) into submission. In the end I'm hoping that the move
> from Oracle will be made easier for others.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cristian Prieto | 2005-09-02 02:23:31 | Trouble with bytea in SPI... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-02 00:02:56 | Re: Performance question (FOR loop) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthew Miller | 2005-09-02 01:58:41 | Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT |
Previous Message | Ricardo Humphreys | 2005-09-02 01:11:05 | Avoid using swap in a cluster |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-09-02 04:34:37 | Re: Version number in psql banner |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-09-02 01:06:18 | Re: [BUGS] PSQL commands not backwards-compatible |