Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job
Date: 2000-10-10 20:57:36
Message-ID: xuyu2ako1mn.fsf@hoser.devel.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> > It is merely a conflict of interest issue. Same issue in law as having
> > attorney's from the same firm on the side of defendant and plaintiff. If
> > the plaintiff is a multi-million dollar client and the defendant is
> > pro-bono... there is concern about bias.
> >
> > Congratulations is in order for Mr. Momjian. I'm not saying he should or
> > shouldn't work for them. I'm just playing devil's advocate.
>
> The interesting issue here is that law firms by nature are adviserial.
> My paper showed that most issues are actually ones of companies managing
> a shared resource, so the analogy is not quite accurate.

OTOH, Red Hat, Inc. employs most of the gcc developers and by far the
most GDB developers(80-90% of commits). There are still mechanisms in
place to hinder that we have any sort of control over these...

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-10 21:02:51 Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-10 20:49:02 Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-10 21:02:51 Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-10 20:49:02 Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job