From: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |
Date: | 2000-10-10 20:57:36 |
Message-ID: | xuyu2ako1mn.fsf@hoser.devel.redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > It is merely a conflict of interest issue. Same issue in law as having
> > attorney's from the same firm on the side of defendant and plaintiff. If
> > the plaintiff is a multi-million dollar client and the defendant is
> > pro-bono... there is concern about bias.
> >
> > Congratulations is in order for Mr. Momjian. I'm not saying he should or
> > shouldn't work for them. I'm just playing devil's advocate.
>
> The interesting issue here is that law firms by nature are adviserial.
> My paper showed that most issues are actually ones of companies managing
> a shared resource, so the analogy is not quite accurate.
OTOH, Red Hat, Inc. employs most of the gcc developers and by far the
most GDB developers(80-90% of commits). There are still mechanisms in
place to hinder that we have any sort of control over these...
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-10 21:02:51 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-10 20:49:02 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-10 21:02:51 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-10 20:49:02 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |