| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |
| Date: | 2000-10-10 21:10:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20559.971212253@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=) writes:
> OTOH, Red Hat, Inc. employs most of the gcc developers and by far the
> most GDB developers(80-90% of commits). There are still mechanisms in
> place to hinder that we have any sort of control over these...
What sort of mechanisms? Perhaps we need to borrow some ideas from
your situation.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Gould | 2000-10-10 21:11:36 | Re: tar.z or rpms - newbie question |
| Previous Message | Dave Smith | 2000-10-10 21:06:37 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mitch Vincent | 2000-10-10 21:13:42 | Possible age() bug? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-10 21:06:40 | Re: [INTERFACES] Announcing PgSQL - a Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to PostgreSQL |