Re: Re: List response time...

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, "Serguei Mokhov" <sa_mokho(at)alcor(dot)concordia(dot)ca>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: List response time...
Date: 2001-08-22 01:55:22
Message-ID: xuyae0sg8ol.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com> writes:

> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
>
> > Mailing lists don't scale well to large numbers of subscribers. I see this
> > delay constantly,on multiple lists. The bigger the list gets, the slower the
> > list gets (and the more loaded the server gets, right Marc? :-)).
>
> Note that the postgresql.org mail server is still running sendmail.
> In my personal experience with sources.redhat.com, qmail is a much
> better choice to handle large mailing lists. When we switched from
> sendmail to qmail, mailing list delays dropped from hours, or
> sometimes even days, to seconds.

The MTA used for various redhat.com mailing lists is postfix (and
mailman as listmanager)

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= 2001-08-22 02:02:24 Re: bugs - lets call an exterminator!
Previous Message Dale Johnson 2001-08-22 01:35:18 Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal