Re: beta testing version

From: teg(at)redhat(dot)com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=d8d?=)
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: beta testing version
Date: 2000-12-05 23:43:44
Message-ID: xuy66kyzb67.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:

> Mitch Vincent wrote:
> >
> > Regardless of what license is best, could the license even be changed now? I
> > mean, some of the initial Berkeley code is still in there in some sense and
> > I would think that the original license (BSD I assume) of the initial source
> > code release would have to be somehow honored.. I'm just wondering if the PG
> > team could change the license even if they wanted to.. I should go read the
> > license again, I know the answer to the above is in there but it's been a
>
> _Every_single_ copyright holder of code in the core server would have to
> agree to any change.

No - GPL projects can include BSD-copyrighted code, no problem
there. That being said, creating bad blood is not a good thing, so an
approach like this would hurt PostgreSQL a lot.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2000-12-06 00:25:22 Re: beta testing version (not really anymore ;)
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2000-12-05 23:27:37 Re: beta testing version