| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mitch Vincent <mitch(at)venux(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: beta testing version |
| Date: | 2000-12-05 23:27:37 |
| Message-ID: | 3A2D79E9.AA584AFC@wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mitch Vincent wrote:
>
> Regardless of what license is best, could the license even be changed now? I
> mean, some of the initial Berkeley code is still in there in some sense and
> I would think that the original license (BSD I assume) of the initial source
> code release would have to be somehow honored.. I'm just wondering if the PG
> team could change the license even if they wanted to.. I should go read the
> license again, I know the answer to the above is in there but it's been a
_Every_single_ copyright holder of code in the core server would have to
agree to any change.
Not a likely event.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=d8d?= | 2000-12-05 23:43:44 | Re: beta testing version |
| Previous Message | Mitch Vincent | 2000-12-05 23:13:33 | Re: beta testing version |