From: | Gunnar R|nning <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no> |
---|---|
To: | "Keith L(dot) Musser" <kmusser(at)idisys(dot)com> |
Cc: | "PGSQL-General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: JDBC Performance |
Date: | 2000-10-10 04:08:39 |
Message-ID: | x63di5wd6g.fsf@thor.candleweb.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Keith L. Musser" <kmusser(at)idisys(dot)com> writes:
> I did try out Peter's new JDBC driver on two very simple query-only
> applications. It was about 15% slower on one of the apps and 10% faster
> on the other, compared with jdbc7.0-1.2.jar. It worked correctly on
> both tests.
>
> Neither is particularly representative, but the fact that one's faster
> an one's slower is surprising. I have not had the time to dig into why
> the discrepancy.
>
I assume you mean the driver the modifications I posted, unless Peter
hasn't checked in anything to CVS recently that I am unaware off ? (I'm not
online with my CVS snapshot at the moment...)
I would sure like to see your applications(or the differences between
them), so I can take a look at analyzing the discrepancies. Also platform
information like jdk version, vendor and OS information is interesting. I
suspect that the optimizations I did can have different effects depending
on the cost of allocating new objects in a specific environment.
Regards,
Gunnar
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-10 04:15:38 | Re: PL/pgSQL syntax help? |
Previous Message | Gunnar R|nning | 2000-10-10 03:47:29 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL encoding question |