Re: Re: JDBC Performance

I did try out Peter's new JDBC driver on two very simple query-only
applications. It was about 15% slower on one of the apps and 10% faster
on the other, compared with jdbc7.0-1.2.jar. It worked correctly on
both tests.

Neither is particularly representative, but the fact that one's faster
an one's slower is surprising. I have not had the time to dig into why
the discrepancy.

- Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Gunnar R|nning <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>; PGSQL-General
<pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Date: Monday, October 09, 2000 6:55 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: JDBC Performance

>On 9 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
>
>> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>>
>> > Applied, and new files added.
>> >
>>
>> Scares me ;-) I just wanted to get some feedback and testers for this
code
>> before actually having it applied. I can also imagine Peter might
have some
>> comments on structure etc. since he got a lot better overview of the
JDBC
>> code as whole.
>
>There's going to be some structure changes happening, mainly with the
>conversion/optimisation work Gunnar's working on, but also with the
>Scrollable ResultSet and regression testing stuff I'm working on at the
>moment.
>
>> Well did anyone review the changes or test them out ? The application
I'm
>> testing is hardly representative for all applications, so there may
still
>> be some bugs left in there.
>
>Which is why I need to get the regression stuff sorted out as soon as I
>can.
>
>Peter
>
>--
>Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk http://www.retep.org.uk
>PostgreSQL JDBC Driver http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
>Java PDF Generator http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
>
>
>