| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "pgsql-hackers\(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE EXTENSION BLOCKS |
| Date: | 2013-04-04 12:16:08 |
| Message-ID: | m28v4ysd87.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I though we were more specific about an extension's object itself not
living in a schema in our documentation, but I agree we still have room
for progress here.
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> writes:
> + Note that only the extension objects will be placed into the named
> + schema; the extension itself is a database-global object.
I think you're patching the right place, but I'm not sure about the term
"database-global object", that I can't find by grepping in sgml/ref.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2013-04-04 12:26:13 | Re: [sepgsql 2/3] Add db_schema:search permission checks |
| Previous Message | Nicolas Barbier | 2013-04-04 10:28:01 | Re: Drastic performance loss in assert-enabled build in HEAD |