Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements
Date: 2010-04-01 19:17:11
Message-ID: m2634bj83s.fsf@hi-media.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Oh, I agree. Since we have a separate WALSender limit, it seems
> counter-intuitive and difficult-to-admin to have the WALSenders also
> limited by superuser_connections. They should be their own separate
> connection pool, just like the other "background" processes.

+1

Regards,
--
dim

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-04-01 22:55:46 Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-04-01 18:49:24 Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2010-04-01 20:57:06 Re: Alpha release this week?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-04-01 18:49:24 Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements