From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |
Date: | 2010-04-01 22:55:46 |
Message-ID: | 1270162546.5640.3227.camel@ebony |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 11:49 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > The thing is, when dealing with new features, we reduce our overall
> > maintenance burden if we get it right the first time. Obviously it's
> > too late for major changes, but minor adjustments to maintain the POLA
> > seem like exactly what we SHOULD be doing right now.
>
> Oh, I agree. Since we have a separate WALSender limit, it seems
> counter-intuitive and difficult-to-admin to have the WALSenders also
> limited by superuser_connections. They should be their own separate
> connection pool, just like the other "background" processes.
>
> However, if this was somehow infeasible, it wouldn't be hard to
> document. That's all.
+1
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-04-02 06:06:04 | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-04-01 19:17:11 | Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-01 23:06:13 | Re: master in standby mode croaks |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2010-04-01 20:57:06 | Re: Alpha release this week? |