| From: | Mark Morgan Lloyd <markMLl(dot)pgsql-general(at)telemetry(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)PostgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Postgresql, PSN hack and table limits |
| Date: | 2011-05-01 05:50:50 |
| Message-ID: | ipisbr$pdt$1@pye-srv-01.telemetry.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a
limited number of rows:
"INPS (a data forensics team) said that there is 7 main Databases all
hosted at different data centers but linked over a type of 'cloud' Each
database uses PostGRESSQL which would mean the most amount of data each
database could hold with no stability issues is aproximitely equal to
that of 10,348,439 Rows" http://pastebin.com/MtX1MDdh
Does anybody have any idea where they've got hold of this figure?
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sim Zacks | 2011-05-01 07:02:47 | Re: "OLD." || myColumnNameVar (How to generically access columns in a trigger's OLD or NEW records) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-05-01 03:25:31 | Re: Values larger than 1/3 of a buffer page cannot be indexed (hstore) |