From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql, PSN hack and table limits |
Date: | 2011-05-02 04:31:49 |
Message-ID: | 4DBE33B5.50506@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 05/01/2011 01:50 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Somebody is making a very specific claim that Postgres can support a
> limited number of rows
Did you find this via
http://www.reversecurity.com/2011/04/new-details-from-psn-hack.html ?
That was the only Google-indexed source leading to it I found. I just
left a note there about the silliness of these claims. I could run more
than a 10M row PostgreSQL instance on my phone. Unless there's a new
16-bit only Vic 20 port of PostgreSQL available or something, it's seems
unlikely the data had to be partitioned due to any hard limit.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Morgan Lloyd | 2011-05-02 06:31:27 | Re: Postgresql, PSN hack and table limits |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-05-02 02:06:07 | Re: "IS LATER THAN" filter for date column |