| From: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Saunders <dsaunders99(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pnewman(at)tripoint(dot)co(dot)uk |
| Subject: | Re: Disk Keeper |
| Date: | 2005-12-01 18:08:59 |
| Message-ID: | c2d9e70e0512011008s162d5ecfs1909edaca1fd867@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/1/05, David Saunders <dsaunders99(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has any body got any experience of using Disk Keeper on Windows (On line
> defragmenter) on the same machine as a PostgreSQL server. We are proposing
> to use it but do not know if it will have any adverse effects on the overall
> performance of the Postgres Server. If anybody is already using this or any
> other defragmentation tool can you let me know.
>
> Many Thanks in advance
>
i don't think this is a good idea... in windows autovacuum is enable
by default (IIRC) and i think will be a conflict if your
defragmentation tool try to work just when autovacuum decides to work
too...
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-12-01 18:12:15 | Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-01 18:08:48 | Re: interval behaviour |