| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tyler MacDonald <tyler(at)yi(dot)org>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen(dot)wiedmann(at)gmail(dot)com>, Paul DuBois <paul(at)snake(dot)net>, dbi-users(at)perl(dot)org, perl(at)lists(dot)mysql(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions? |
| Date: | 2005-12-01 18:12:15 |
| Message-ID: | 438F3CFF.50006@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>Where is Postgres at with psql using savepoints implicitly to wrap every
>client command btw? My single biggest pet peeve with Postgres is that setting
>autocommit off in psql is basically unusable because any typo forces you to
>start your transaction all over again.
>
>
Going to have to disagree with you here. I use it all day long ;). If I
need a savepoint, I define one.
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-12-01 18:21:00 | Re: Question |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-12-01 18:08:59 | Re: Disk Keeper |