Re: pg_dump ignoring without oids

From: "Chris Velevitch" <chris(dot)velevitch(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump ignoring without oids
Date: 2008-04-04 05:44:44
Message-ID: b0a3bf780804032244l7f6fd429md8e3d2d66d3a57ef@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Chris Velevitch" <chris(dot)velevitch(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Chris Velevitch
> > <chris(dot)velevitch(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> In the mean time, which download has only the 7.4 utils and can that
> >> be installed without removing my 8.1 utils.
>
> > I'm using Centos 5.
>
> Um ... Red Hat, who are about as conservative as they come on this type
> of issue, shipped PG 8.1.x in RHEL 5. Which benighted PHB decreed that
> you should be using 7.4.x?

We're using a shared hosting database service. They were using 7.4
when we first started using them and they haven't upgraded unless we
pay them to. We are their only pg customer.

>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Chris
--
Chris Velevitch
Manager - Sydney Flash Platform Developers Group
m: 0415 469 095
www.flashdev.org.au

Sydney Flash Platform Developers Group
April meeting: TBD
Date: Mon 28th April 6pm for 6:30 start
Details soon

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2008-04-04 05:48:59 Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-04 05:40:35 Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong