Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong

From: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Stuart Brooks" <stuartb(at)cat(dot)co(dot)za>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ANALYZE getting dead tuple count hopelessly wrong
Date: 2008-04-04 05:48:59
Message-ID: 2e78013d0804032248j6b0d6683sea192d7260eb0ff2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> The
> policy of this project is that we only put nontrivial bug fixes into
> back branches, and I don't think this item qualifies ...
>

Got it. I will submit a patch for HEAD.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-04-04 06:21:37 Re: pg_dump ignoring without oids
Previous Message Chris Velevitch 2008-04-04 05:44:44 Re: pg_dump ignoring without oids

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2008-04-04 08:36:08 Re: Patch queue -> wiki (was varadic patch)
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2008-04-04 05:43:30 Re: best way for export gram.y symbols