Re: [GENERAL] Performance

From: Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Jason <neumeier(at)bright(dot)net>, "'psql'" <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "Aaron Holtz (E-mail)" <aholtz(at)bright(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Performance
Date: 1999-03-30 19:05:52
Message-ID: Pine.SGI.3.95.990330105923.28173B-100000@bleu.west.spy.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

# Anyway, regardless...for the price of that one Sparc E450 we
# picked up, I could pick up *easily* a dozen Dual-PII 450 servers, and
# run something like Beowulf on it to do the raytracing...
#
# Wait, isn't that what IBM just did? Built a Beowulf cluster of
# Netfnity servers for ~$150k, that outperformed a $5.5Million Cray? And,
# I *thought* they did something like raytracing with it...I can't
# remmeber the full article, but it was ... enlightening. If you want me
# to dig aruond and find the URL to it, please ask...

As soon as postgres becomes a distributed database, the above will
become relevant. For now, you need to build it all into a single box with
a lot of I/O and a decent amount of CPU and RAM. Each of my 336Mhz
Ultra-SPARC processors has 4MB of CPU cache and 1GB of RAM. I currently
only have four processors in each box, but they'll hold 14. We didn't buy
them for this, though, we bought them for I/O.

--
SA, beyond.com My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
| Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rudy Gireyev 1999-03-30 19:19:00 Re: [GENERAL] Performance
Previous Message Jackson, DeJuan 1999-03-30 18:49:06 RE: [GENERAL] Performance