Re: logical column position

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical column position
Date: 2003-11-18 03:02:44
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0311180401320.639-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:

> BTW, one main consideration is that all the postgres admin apps will now
> need to support ORDER BY attlognum for 7.5+.

But that is only really important if they've also used the ALTER TABLE
RESHUFFLE COLUMNS feature. So if they make one alteration for 7.5, they
need to do another. That seems fair.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-11-18 03:10:20 Re: Release cycle length
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-11-18 03:00:01 Re: Release cycle length