Re: logical column position

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical column position
Date: 2003-11-18 03:10:25
Message-ID: 3FB98DA1.1080303@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>BTW, one main consideration is that all the postgres admin apps will now
>>need to support ORDER BY attlognum for 7.5+.
>
>
> But that is only really important if they've also used the ALTER TABLE
> RESHUFFLE COLUMNS feature. So if they make one alteration for 7.5, they
> need to do another. That seems fair.

Good point.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2003-11-18 03:15:11 Re: logical column position
Previous Message Neil Conway 2003-11-18 03:10:20 Re: Release cycle length