Re: UTF-8 encoding question regarding PhpPgAdmin development

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: UTF-8 encoding question regarding PhpPgAdmin development
Date: 2003-01-07 20:59:29
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0301071909100.29178-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jean-Michel POURE writes:

> - Are some database encodings not translatable into UTF-8 using SET
> CLIENT_ENCODING = 'Unicode'. It used to be the case for Latin1, but it has
> been fixed now.

It should be possible. If not, it's a bug.

> - Some letters, like the euro sign, do not belong to Latin1. Example: let's
> say we have a Latin1 database and use SET CLIENT_ENCODING = 'Unicode'. If I
> input a euro sign, does it get rejected by PostgreSQL?

Currently, it gives you a warning and ignores the character. Not sure
that is ideal.

> - More generaly, is it safe to convert an Encoding (ex: Latin1 or Chinese
> multi-byte) into UTF-8 using SET CLIENT_ENCODING? Can all multi-byte
> encodings be converted into/from UTF-8 safely?

Some points to keep in mind: Some character sets contain characters that
are not in Unicode, although you might choose to ignore that fact because
it is of relatively minor importance. Round-trip conversion is not safely
possible, so if your tool provides a read/edit/write tool then you will
have problems. Finally, when you display East Asian characters you will
have a font problem because the Chinese, Japanese, and Korean characters
are mapped to the same range in Unicode but you are supposed to use
country-specific glyphs.

In short, I don't think what you are trying to do is easily achievable.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-07 21:08:33 Re: Read-only transactions
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-01-07 20:58:33 Re: IPv6 patch