Re: Sun Pushing MySQL but Mentions PostgreSQL

From: "Aurangzeb M(dot) Agha" <aagha(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Jim Caley <caley(at)chesco(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sun Pushing MySQL but Mentions PostgreSQL
Date: 2002-08-20 21:17:14
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0208201407060.28689-100000@cinemaspace.berkeley.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks for posting this Jim. Its always good to have others point you in
a direction where you can keep the pulse on the wrist of the industry.

While I don't have an opinion on Sun's LAMP initiative, I do think it's
important to point out that at the end of the day, all the software we
use, languages, IDE's, DB's, are all tools to get a job done--I'm sure I'm
preaching to the choir.

I suspect that LAMP is pushing for MySQL because _they_feel_ (emphasis)
that it'll be an easier tool for their user-base to use.

I struggled to choose between either MySQL and PostgreSQL for my current
contract (in Greece--the weather here rox, BTW!!!) simply because I'm a
complete novice to DB's. As an application developer, I'm making my first
jump into actually designing, building, and maintaining my own, large,
multi-lingual DB. A the end of the day, I decided to go with PostgreSQL
simply because I felt that it was a better tool than MySQL
_for_this_project (emphasis), but it doesn't mean that I wouldn't choose
MySQL for another project.

I hope this last statement (or any other part of this e-mail) doesn't get
me flamed like a Greek Souvlaki (like a gyro).

Peace from Greece,
Please don't flame me, ;-)
Aurangzeb

On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Jim Caley wrote:

:A while back in the "read this and puke" thread, some were bemoaning
:Sun's LAMP initiative, where the 'M' stands for MySQL. I was just
:reading about this in eWeek
:(http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,476267,00.asp) and doing a little
:bemoaning myself. The article quotes Jonathan Schwartz, Sun's new head
:of software, explaining it.
:
:But then I came across an article by InfoWorld's Steve Gillmor
:(http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/02/08/19/020819opcurve.xml)
:where the same Jonathan Schwartz says, "We will go drive Linux like a
:wedge. We will go hollow out DB2 and WebSphere with either a free
:database or a free app server. We can give away the Apache Web server,
:Postgres, a free directory, a free messaging system, a free calendar and
:free portal, a free infrastructure. All of it for free for 100 users,
:and we can still make money. Microsoft can't."
:
:The "Postgres" seems to have been thrown into his little riff casually;
:it's not "official" like the MySQL in LAMP. But I thought it was
:interesting nonetheless.
:
:Jim Caley
:
:
:---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
:TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
:

--
Aurangzeb M. Agha | Email : aagha(at)bigfoot(dot)com
| Home : +3 010 8959.558
34 Nafsika St. | Direct: +3 010 8995.875
Voula 16673 | Mobile: TBD
Greece | Voice : 415 412 4234 (US Only)
| e-Fax : 978 246.0770
PGP ID: 0x68B3A763 |

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

- Benjamin Franklin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2002-08-20 22:05:26 Re: Timezone With Timestamp
Previous Message Clinton Adams 2002-08-20 21:11:51 Re: DAO for PostGRE