Re: MATCH FULL flawed?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MATCH FULL flawed?
Date: 2001-10-24 14:10:40
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0110222357500.11257-100000@aguila.protecne.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm trying MATCH FULL and it looks like it doesn't work (does anyone use
> > it anyway?).
>
> You're not using it right. You specified a separate MATCH FULL
> constraint for each column:

Thank you very much for the clarification. I was actually reading the
docs and couldn't find the right way to do it.

Now that I think about it: it's in the column_constraint part of the
definition! Shouldn't it only be in the table_constraint part? It
doesn't make much sense.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]atentus(dot)com>)
"La verdad no siempre es bonita, pero el hambre de ella si"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dominic J. Eidson 2001-10-24 14:18:00 Re: Disable Transaction - plans ?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2001-10-24 14:10:22 Re: locking and web interfaces