| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: MATCH FULL flawed? |
| Date: | 2001-10-24 21:55:51 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0110242149120.647-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Now that I think about it: it's in the column_constraint part of the
> definition! Shouldn't it only be in the table_constraint part? It
> doesn't make much sense.
"Sense" is something you're going to have to talk to the SQL standards
committee about. ;-) It's standardized, it's implemented, therefore it's
legal and documented. However, you're right in that it's rather useless.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-10-24 21:56:37 | Re: How to use SSL conections? |
| Previous Message | Aasmund Midttun Godal | 2001-10-24 21:51:06 | Re: Function won't compile |