Re: Best practice? Web application: single PostgreSQL

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: "Keith G(dot) Murphy" <keithmur(at)mindspring(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Best practice? Web application: single PostgreSQL
Date: 2004-01-13 17:52:27
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0401131051350.22609-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Keith G. Murphy wrote:

> I'm trying to get a feel for what most people are doing or consider best
> practice.
>
> Given a mod_perl application talking to a PostgreSQL database on the
> same host, where different users are logging onto the web server using
> LDAP for authentication, do most people
>
> 1) have the web server connecting to the database using its own user
> account (possibly through ident), and controlling access to different
> database entities strictly through the application itself
>
> 2) have the web server connecting to the database actually using the
> user's account (possibly using LDAP authentication against PostgreSQL),
> and controlling access to different database entities through GRANT, etc.
>
> Obviously, (2) leads to more database connections, and you still have to
> have the application do some work in terms of which forms are available
> to which users, etc. But I'm a little worried about whether it's best
> security practice.

I do 1. different language (PHP) same basic thing though. All security
is handled by ACLS I build myself in Postgresql and interrogate via my own
application.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-01-13 17:58:32 Re: Postgress and MYSQL
Previous Message Thapliyal, Deepak 2004-01-13 17:47:49 Nested transaction - I am a bank ??