From: | "Thapliyal, Deepak" <dthapliyal(at)soe(dot)sony(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Richard Huxton' <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Anton(dot)Nikiforov(at)loteco(dot)ru |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Nested transaction - I am a bank ?? |
Date: | 2004-01-13 17:47:49 |
Message-ID: | 1FE5193EE2768D478949FC0AFBFFC43B06EBDE11@mail-sd1.station.sony.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
Assume I have a bank app.. When customer withdraws $10 from his accouint I
have to do following
--> update account_summary table [subtract $10 from his account]
--> update account detail_table [with other transaction details]
Requirement:
either both transactions should succeed or both transactions should
be rolled back in case of failure.
Question:
if my first update succeeds and second fails (say due to space
errors .. I have inconsistancy ..
Per the thread below stored procedures/functions cannot have commits. I
assume that means that they will be implicitly commited ??
How do I approach this simple requirment using psql ?
Thx
Deep
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Richard Huxton
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 4:32 AM
To: Anton(dot)Nikiforov(at)loteco(dot)ru
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Parse error help needed...
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 12:01, Anton(dot)Nikiforov(at)loteco(dot)ru wrote:
> RH> Remove the "commit" line - functions cannot define their own
> transactions RH> anyway.
> Do you know if it will be solved sometime? Or this is architecture
> dependend problem? I mean that transactions are rulez and very helpful
> rulez when working with large databases.
Nested transactions are on the todo list, but I don't know when they will
appear.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-01-13 17:52:27 | Re: Best practice? Web application: single PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Chris Ochs | 2004-01-13 17:46:45 | Re: sql insert function |