| From: | Gregor Zeitlinger <zeitling(at)informatik(dot)hu-berlin(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| Date: | 2003-10-22 22:22:55 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0310230019220.24570-100000@mitte.informatik.hu-berlin.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-chat pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> But why put yourself to such bother? I have never found a good reason to
> do this sort of thing.
I think there is a huge potential for XML databases once there are good
ones and people start using them more extensively.
But for having real fast xml databases it's too slow to store them in
relational tables. After all, if you were designing a database for xml
data only - would you come up with tables to store them?
--
Gregor Zeitlinger
gregor(at)zeitlinger(dot)de
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-10-23 01:39:54 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| Previous Message | Gregor Zeitlinger | 2003-10-22 22:16:21 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lauri Pietarinen | 2003-10-22 23:08:28 | Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL |
| Previous Message | Gregor Zeitlinger | 2003-10-22 22:16:21 | Re: is GiST still alive? |