| From: | Gregor Zeitlinger <zeitling(at)informatik(dot)hu-berlin(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| Date: | 2003-10-22 22:16:21 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0310230013500.24570-100000@mitte.informatik.hu-berlin.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-chat pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Christopher Browne wrote:
> It leaves open the question of what is the appropriate way of
> expressing XML entities and attributes and CDATA in database form.
<snip>
Thanx for your advise, but that's not what I had in mind. The original
idea to have a native xml database was that I doesn't work too well in a
relational database.
I was just wondering wheater I have to reinvent the wheel of database
technology when it comes to transaction processing, ACID, and Indexes,
which a native xml database ought to have as well.
--
Gregor Zeitlinger
gregor(at)zeitlinger(dot)de
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregor Zeitlinger | 2003-10-22 22:22:55 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-10-22 21:43:31 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregor Zeitlinger | 2003-10-22 22:22:55 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
| Previous Message | Anthony W. Youngman | 2003-10-22 21:46:10 | Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL |