Re: Which database part 2

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Kaarel <kaarel(at)future(dot)ee>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Which database part 2
Date: 2003-06-16 19:11:48
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0306161311250.2361-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Justin Clift wrote:

> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Kaarel,
> >
> >
> >>Why did SourceForge.net move from PostgreSQL to DB2?
> >
> >
> > Perhaps because VA Software made a multi-million dollar deal with IBM?
> > <grin>
>
> So this has been transitioned already? The SF.net site has been
> extremely flaky recently (have been trying to do things on it
> extensively in the last few weeks). Wonder if it's transition or DB2
> related?

It happened some time in the spring of 2002 I believe.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-06-16 19:57:08 Re: Which database part 2
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-06-16 18:42:05 Re: Which database part 2