Re: Which database part 2

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Kaarel <kaarel(at)future(dot)ee>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Which database part 2
Date: 2003-06-16 19:57:08
Message-ID: 200306161257.08491.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Guys,

> > > Perhaps because VA Software made a multi-million dollar deal with IBM?
> > > <grin>
> >
> > So this has been transitioned already? The SF.net site has been
> > extremely flaky recently (have been trying to do things on it
> > extensively in the last few weeks). Wonder if it's transition or DB2
> > related?
>
> It happened some time in the spring of 2002 I believe.

BTW, as a VA stockholder, I supported the decision, just because VA would have
been Chapter 11 otherwise ....

-Josh

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Schilling 2003-06-16 20:10:10 Re: Which database part 2
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-06-16 19:11:48 Re: Which database part 2