Vince Vielhaber writes:
> For example:
>
> insert into foo(foo.a) values(1);
>
> fails because the table name is used. Update statements also include the
> table name. Both fail. Does anyone know of a workaround?
Completely loudly to whomever wrote that SQL. It's completely
non-standard.
(The implication I'm trying to make is that there's no way to make
PostgreSQL accept that statement. Adding this as an extension has been
rejected in the past.)
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net