Re: insert statements

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: insert statements
Date: 2002-03-14 02:25:39
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.40.0203132115280.99604-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Vince Vielhaber writes:
>
> > For example:
> >
> > insert into foo(foo.a) values(1);
> >
> > fails because the table name is used. Update statements also include the
> > table name. Both fail. Does anyone know of a workaround?
>
> Completely loudly to whomever wrote that SQL. It's completely
> non-standard.
>
> (The implication I'm trying to make is that there's no way to make
> PostgreSQL accept that statement. Adding this as an extension has been
> rejected in the past.)

Yeah, that's kinda what I expected. There's just under 1700 insert and
update statements but only 1200 selects. Neither option sounds good at
this point.

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-03-14 02:48:09 GIST
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-03-14 02:14:25 Re: insert statements