Re: Postgresql 7.1.2

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Michael A(dot) Peters" <mpeters(at)mac(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgresql 7.1.2
Date: 2001-06-09 23:04:11
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0106100057310.778-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Michael A. Peters writes:

> Perhaps the e-mail addresses should be kept private that are in that file if
> they don't want them contacted- but that's a different issue and doesn't warrant
> discussion except among those people and postgresql.

I guess it's okay to Cc: people, but the problem was mostly that mail
didn't get to the lists at all. Never mind, though, I was a bit cynical.

> I was referring to the postgresql book,

The available book was finished before 7.1 came out.

> and the fact that this change (which
> seems major to me) isn't referenced in the Changelog (which doesn't seem to
> have anything from 7.0 to 7.1), install file, or whatever.

The HISTORY file has:

Store tables as files named by OID (Vadim)

The ChangeLog files are mostly nonsense, IMHO.

> On linux I run postgresql 7.0.3- which isn't that old.
> Won't update till I need to- perhaps this change needs to be mentioned in
> the ChangeLog or Install file (or the FAQ) since it has a big impact on
> startup scripts that look for template1 in the ~/data/base/ directory to
> determine wether or not postgresql has been properly initiated.

What happens in the data directory was always an internal matter, except
for the PG_VERSION file perhaps.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

  • PGDG? at 2001-06-10 00:53:07 from Tim Mickol

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Flacco 2001-06-09 23:43:14 More flexible case-sensitivity options in future PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Michael A. Peters 2001-06-09 17:43:44 Re: Postgresql 7.1.2